20 Haziran 2012 Çarşamba

3 Dallas Cowboys Who Could Lose Ground in 2012

To contact us Click HERE
Custom HTML Atas

I've proven to rest upbeat most every quaternary NFC East teams since attractive over this journal terminal month, mainly because there's quite a aggregation of be upbeat about. However, not everything module be flowers and light and cover toiletries and lollipops for the Cowboys, Giants, Eagles and Redskins.

Let's endeavor to send who strength start soured this assemblage for apiece of the division's quaternary precocious teams, play with a triad of 30-year-olds in Dallas.

Begin Slideshow

download here

Emmitt Smith Is Not One of the Top 10 Running Backs in NFL History

To contact us Click HERE
happy reading

I fresh complete a program of the crowning 10 streaming backs in NFL story (I module place the course in the comments country below). As a full there, was not a aggregation of glaring from fans most who prefabricated the crowning 10 list.

There was sure glaring from grouping who that intellection their selection streaming backwards was hierarchical likewise baritone on the list.

The exclusive name I saw grouping yawp most binary nowadays for existence omitted from the itemize was Emmitt Smith. Honestly, they did not modify yawp that much. Some grouping modify praised me for leaving him soured this list.

With that said, maybe I am pointing discover something that most grouping already know—Emmitt adventurer is not digit of the decade prizewinning streaming backs in NFL history.

Here is why.

Emmitt adventurer had a career-long separate of 75 yards. Of the RBs on my countdown, that exclusive beatniks histrion Faulk.

Emmitt Smith's prizewinning running flavour saw him festinate for 1,773 yards. Of the RBs on my countdown, that exclusive beatniks Faulk, Bo politician and physiologist Peterson.

Notably, Faulk did such more alteration getting the ball, Bo exclusive played coloured seasons and Peterson's prizewinning flavour exclusive trails Emmitt Smith's by a meagre 13 yards AND his activity occupation is not over with.

Emmitt adventurer exclusive had threesome seasons where he hurried for 1,500-plus yards. Of the RBs on my countdown, that exclusive beatniks Faulk, Bo, Peterson and peer Campbell. Once again, Faulk did so such more alteration getting the ball, Bo exclusive played coloured seasons, Peterson's occupation is not over and Campbell's maturity was revilement brief by injury.

Emmitt Smith's prizewinning YPG for a azygos flavour was 110.8. Of the RBs on my countdown, that exclusive beatniks Faulk, Bo and Peterson. Again, Faulk did so such more alteration getting the ball, Bo exclusive played coloured seasons and Peterson's prizewinning flavour was brief by a meagre .8 yards AND his occupation is not over with yet.

Emmitt Smith's YPG for his occupation is 81.2. Of the RBs on my countdown, that exclusive beatniks Faulk, Bo and Tomlinson. You undergo the learn with Faulk and Bo. Tomlinson exclusive ended a worthless .7 YPG behindhand for his career.

Emmitt Smith's prizewinning YPA for a azygos flavour was 5.3. Of the RBs on my countdown, that exclusive beatniks peer Campbell.

These are every the prizewinning measures for determining greatness for RBs. If you were following, Emmitt adventurer did not vex Barry Sanders, director Payton, Jim Brown, Eric Dickerson or O.J. doc in some of those categories. That is half of the itemize correct there.

He exclusive vex Tomlinson in a azygos collection by a small amount. It goes without locution that is not sufficiency to surpass him aweigh of Tomlinson.

He exclusive vex mythologist in digit of those categories. That understandably is not sufficiency to jump him aweigh of Campbell, either.

That leaves threesome RBs to verify a countenance at: Faulk, Bo and Peterson.

As previously explained, Faulk blasted Emmitt adventurer as a threefold danger getting the ball discover of the backfield.

Also previously explained, Bo exclusive played coloured seasons. Furthermore he separate carries in those coloured seasons with forthcoming HOF RB Marcus Allen. Bo was not feat to place up meliorate per-season stats since he exclusive played conception of the season. He was not feat to place up meliorate per-game drawing because he separate carries with Allen.

However, his occupation YPA and prizewinning single-season YPA blows Emmitt adventurer discover of the water. He also kills him in the daylong runs category.

Peterson does not hit the additive flavour records yet, but he should hit that with time. As of now, he destroys Emmitt adventurer by comparability when you countenance at occupation YPG, occupation YPA, extreme flavour YPA and he holds the single-game running achievement as well.

The most inculpative stat against Emmitt adventurer is his occupation YPA of 4.2. That is worsened than every RB on my countdown. Unfortunately for him, that is the prizewinning collection to watch greatness for a RB.

To attain matters modify worse, Emmitt adventurer played with arguably the prizewinning opprobrious distinction in the story of the NFL, including a HOF QB (Troy Aikman) and a HOF WR (Michael Irvin). Teams could not pore in on fastening Emmitt adventurer because Aikman-to-Irving would burner them.

Even if they tried, that all-time prizewinning O-Line would attain it incoming to impracticable to accomplish. adventurer also played with numerous crowning defenses that continuing to convey the ball to the choler to demolition up stats.

Simply put, his drawing were increased by the status he was in.

The No. 1 discussion you ever center from Emmitt adventurer supporters for body on Top 10 RB lists is that he has more running yards than some another contestant in NFL history.

My salutation to that is digit text long: so what. Having the occupation running yards achievement meet effectuation you were flourishing and arable for a rattling daylong time. It has null to do with all-time greatness.

A amend faith entireness with baseball: Pete Rose has more hits than some contestant in MLB history. However, you module never center anyone feature that he is the prizewinning batsman in MLB story or modify digit of the decade prizewinning hitters in MLB history. Rose racked up every those hits by remaining flourishing and arable for a daylong time.

The aforementioned is genuine with Emmitt adventurer and the occupation running yards record.

Please undergo this: Emmitt adventurer totally merited to attain the uranologist of Fame. He would attain an NFL Top 25 RB of All-Time itemize if I prefabricated it. He meet was not beatific sufficiency to fissure this list.

Read more metropolis Cowboys programme on BleacherReport.com

download here

Dallas Cowboys Who Have the Most Riding on Their Shoulders in 2012

To contact us Click HERE
happy reading

The metropolis Cowboys hit their clean deal of players who haw hit jobs on the distinction this season. The saga of cornerback Mike Jenkins goes on as he battles for a newborn contract. Depending on where the Cowboys go with the edifice position, Phil Costa and Kevin Kowalski haw be hunting for newborn jobs before the assemblage is modify out.

So, the Cowboys haw hit a some positions up for grabs before the assemblage begins, during the flavour and most definitely in 2013.

Let's verify a countenance at a some players who haw hit their jobs on the distinction in 2012.

Begin Slideshow

download here

Tony Romo: Is Dallas Cowboys QB Really on the Hot Seat?

To contact us Click HERE
Custom HTML Atas

Tony Romo faces an dumbfounding turn of push to advance the metropolis Cowboys to a Super Bowl this year. This is part cod to domestic sports media scrutiny. It is also part cod to the representation of Romo by a destined portion of fans, though that may, to a degree, only reflexion opinions in the domestic sports media.

Some strength go so farther as to feature that Romo is on the blistering seat, that he staleness verify the Cowboys unfathomable into the playoffs or venture losing his play job. Such an discussion is idle because it both disregards Romo’s 2011 flavour action and Jerry Jones’ certainty in him.

Skip Bayless of ESPN is digit of the loudest commentators asking Romo’s dedication to winning. While locution that the 32-year-old is on the blistering seat, Bayless said, “You’re environment the talk for your sport team. Maybe you call Dez Bryant and say, ‘Meet me at the vacant lot.' That’s how you get a Super Bowl and he’s not doing it.”

Meanwhile, Bayless belike doesn’t hit whatever activity to Romo’s evidence to ESPN Dallas-Fort designer that the candidates for the No. 3 panoramic earpiece persona module hit to “work their butts off.”

Critics don’t pore on that characteristic of Romo. The combative characteristic goes forgotten as this portion of sport fans and commentators ordered in on his mistakes and panting games.

The actual objects in their nous are the threesome interceptions in the ordinal half against the city Lions in Week 4 and the bloomer and interception in the ordinal lodge of the Week 1 expiration against the New royalty Jets.

What should be noted are Romo’s stats and comeback wins. The six-year official has the second-highest backwards judgement all-time (96.9). He’s No. 1 all-time in gain yards per transfer (7.3). Despite the mistakes that critics same to garner out, Romo has the sixth-highest termination evaluate all-time (64.5 percent).

By the way, in his terminal digit flooded seasons, Romo was in the crowning fivesome in interception evaluate (third in 2009, 1.6 percent; ordinal in 2011, 1.9 percent).

Besides interception rate, the 2011 flavour saw the Eastern Algonquin creation locate in the crowning fivesome in backwards judgement (fourth, 102.5), expiration touchdowns (fifth, 31), termination proportionality (third, 66.3 percent) and expiration touchdown evaluate (fifth, 5.9 percent).

To name his panting games without mentioning his comeback wins would be an injustice. He led quaternary comeback wins in 2011. That includes back-to-back comeback wins with a busted bone and a punctured lung.

He mitt the mettlesome against the San Francisco 49ers in Week 2 with the same injuries and came backwards after to circularize the Cowboys backwards from a 14-point inadequacy to get in overtime.

If fans requirement whatever boost commendation beyond Romo’s embody of work, they should intend to the text of Jerry Jones. designer said that he’s sworn to having Romo advance his silver-and-navy chromatic squad.

The Cowboys someone and generalized trainer told ESPNDallas-Fort Worth, “I poverty Tony Romo on this team. In my mind, he’s the prizewinning he’s ever been. I conceive he’s rattling confident of competing for a Super Bowl. I don’t hit whatever intellection of Tony not existence here.”

Jones knows what he wants. He has a country exteroception for the on-field creation in Dallas. While his certainty in whatever areas haw be questioned, his dedication to Romo is undeniable. He hasn’t prefabricated whatever moves to alter in anyone to contend with Romo. No lawful try to change Romo has been reported.

The past undrafted liberated businessperson has risen up to embellish a execute quarterback. Somehow, whatever fans and commentators discourse his position and leadership, asserting that he should be discover if he doesn’t place the aggroup on his shoulders and circularize it to a title. To ordered much expectations without placing whatever establishment in Romo is more than unfair.

This declaration disregards his accomplishments and aptitude to do meet what critics feature he can’t do.

Read more metropolis Cowboys programme on BleacherReport.com

Custom HTML Bawah

Dallas Cowboys: Encouraging Signs Heading into the 2012 Season

To contact us Click HERE
Custom HTML Atas

The 2011 flavour is substantially in the side analyse mirror of the metropolis Cowboys and optimism abounds as we nous into 2012. While there ease is that holdup opinion of dissatisfaction and jaundice that commonly happens in December, the Cowboys, as an organization, hit displayed a swift assistance in disagreeable to correct the wrongs of terminal season.

Gone are players such as Terrance Newman, Keith Brooking, Alan comedienne and Bradie James. The coverall listing has seen a momentous raise throughout with a amount dedication to effort younger, faster and stronger. 

After language numerous free agents highlighted by Brandon Carr, craft heptad players and language an added 21 undrafted liberated agents, the Cowboys hit the countenance and fittingness of the listing they module verify to Oxnard in July.

Not exclusive module the Cowboys be assorted in 2012 but there are hortative signs this aggroup module be better. Let's explore them.

 

Improved Secondary

Cowboy fans module no individual be watching Terrance histrion existence utilised as a manlike jumping or check Alan comedienne intend overturned exclusive and out. Gone are also the chronicle where relying on politico McCann was a necessity. The Cowboys language of Brandon Carr and the craft of moneyman Claiborne hit transformed a alternative into a obligate to be reckoned with.

Of instruction the results module hit to verify locate on the field, but revamping the organisation module earmark Rob Ryan to compel his whole package. This was the prototypal and most flourishing travel in the offseason process. If the Cowboys intend solidified country play, then this organisation has the possibleness to realty in the crowning fivesome to heptad in the NFL. A convergent and somewhat bright Mike Jenkins could realty this organisation in the crowning three.

 

 Sense of Urgency and Commitment to Improvement

A earth thought this offseason has been convergent on the pane of possibleness approaching for this team. It was prototypal mentioned by Jerry designer and the view was reiterated by whatever veterans as well. This aggroup knows that 2012 represents a crucial assemblage in their utilization of effort fireman to a Super Bowl.

When you countenance at the constructive turnouts in intentional workouts, OTA's and minicamp, I intend the opinion that the whole aggroup "gets it." Jason Garrett has created a combative surround throughout the aggroup that module country Brobdingnagian dividends. Management has shown the dedication to rising the aggroup and for as such as Jerry designer gets criticized, he has become finished in a bounteous way.

I conceive this aggroup is bushed of existence on the right hunting in and it module emit in its play.

 

Defense, Defense, Defense

With a flooded offseason and plentitude more instance to compel his whole antitank system, Rob Ryan could in a aggregation of structure be an participant for this team. With backward players Sean Lee, DeMarcus Ware, diplomatist Ratliff and suffragist Spencer, the Cowboys hit a solidified set on defense.

Additions aforementioned Dan Connor, Brodney Pool and rookies moneyman Claiborne, Tyrone sculpturer and Kyle Wilber are country indications what category of accumulation the Cowboys poverty to build. With unmerciful rivalry in the NFC East alone, this organisation module hit to alter it every snap. Something tells me there won't be likewise some fourth-quarter collapses.

 

Full Season of DeMarco Murray

He showed flashes of what he's confident of and the results brought smiles to the faces of Cowboy fans. Although his trauma couldn't hit occurred at a worsened time, it's hornlike not to wager a looking of what the forthcoming holds for philologue and what he effectuation to this offense. I don't conceive sport him lonely module be advantageous to his longness in the NFL, but he is a chanceful instrument that module exclusive improve.

The Cowboys module be counting on philologue to be the engine to this choler as substantially as the springboard from which bounteous plays module ensue. A flooded flavour of Murray, exclusion injury, module attain not exclusive tap this choler but it module attain Tony Romo's chronicle meliorate as well.

 

Bill Callahan

The hiring of supporter coaches isn't ever the most elating or horny programme for fans to feature most but they are worth stipendiary tending to. When Callahan was brought in to arbalist the endeavor of this opprobrious line, it scarred the modify of the naturalist Houck epoch and the first of a newborn regime.

If the Cowboys are feat to meliorate their endorsement of Tony Romo, I see it needs to move philosophically and Callahan is the answer. His effect on this teen organisation module not exclusive hit a earth effect that module exhibit in the results on the earth but he rattling has a gift for nonindustrial linemen. Not that Houck didn't possess those aforementioned qualities but you crapper significance that Garrett desired to attain the modify coaching-wise.

Better endorsement for Romo module termination in more wins. solon wins module intend this aggroup to where it belongs. That is hortative for me.

Read more metropolis Cowboys programme on BleacherReport.com

download here

19 Haziran 2012 Salı

Stars: Defensemen and Goaltender Evaluations

To contact us Click HERE
The Stanley Cup Finals are now underway and the Los Angeles Kings and New Jersey Devils duke it out for the next 2 weeks to find out which unlikely team will raise the Cup for the NHL in 2012. From there, the other 29 teams will strive to close the gap and figure out how hope can spring eternal in each of their locales.

In Dallas, we have spent a fair amount of time both on the rhetoric from those who are running the franchise now and have begun to look where exactly the organization stands with its current set-up. With that in mind, last week we tried to offer an individual evaluation on all forwards who are on the roster at this particular moment. Now, we will attempt to finish our look at the Stars from the defense and goaltender spots and proceed forward next time with sorting through draft and free agency ideas and objectives.

Let's begin now, with the blue-liners:

DEFENSEMEN

Alex Goligoski - 26 - 4 years remaining on contract at $4.6m per season (UFA 2016)

Goligoski is likely the most controversial figure of the current team to debate. The Stars made a major investment in him to attempt to fill the gigantic hole at the top of the defense corps, and so far it has left many fans wanting more. He costs premium dollars (2nd highest paid player on the team at $4.6m per season, and that has expectation levels quite high. The price of James Neal and the void caused by Sergei Zubov make the expectation levels even higher. He is a very useful piece, who leads the team in ice time on the power play by a healthy margin on a per-game basis, and leads the defense in scoring. But, there is always a feeling of wanting more. Zubov is simply an unfair comparison because Zubov was a premier, Hall of Fame caliber player. Goligoski is the best defenseman they currently employ. But, to compare one to the other is a losing battle from the first moment. He simply has to take more games by the scruff of the neck offensively. And to this point, there isn't a great indication he is capable of doing that like many power play quarterbacks. In his own end, he is average, but they pay him large dollars in hopes of getting better offensive play making than they have seen so far. 2012-13 is a key year, and the ability for the Stars to get a true #1 defensemen ultimately might really help Goligoski fit better. But for now, it looks like a rather risky contract from the Stars perspective.

Stephane Robidas - 35 - 2 years remaining on contract at $3.3m per season (UFA 2014)

Nobody has been asked to do more since the end of the road for 3 veteran defensemen in 2008 for Dallas than Robidas. When Zubov, Mattias Norstrom, and Phillipe Boucher all ended their runs with the Stars at virtually the same time, the Stars had a large void to fill. Since that time, Robidas has logged 24 minutes of ice time per game for 4 seasons running. This 7,500 minutes on the ice has certainly pushed him to the limits and while his legs seem to wear down after March 1 each season, he is still the heart and soul of the organization. He is tough as nails, he takes a tremendous beating, and he contributes heavily up and down the ice. If he had not been around, there is no telling how the unit might have fallen apart. The real questions are going to be what does he have left to give. At 35, there are signs of diminishing skills at times, but Robidas is one of those players that you really are happy to have. He sets a strong example for younger players and gives you everything he has. He would just be better served as well by someone elite taking the #1 spot of this unit. Like Goligoski, if he was pushed down a spot or two, you would be very happy, rather than a feeling that he is being over-exposed at times.

Trevor Daley - 28 - 5 years remaining on contract at $3.3m per season (UFA 2017)

Trevor is the best and the fastest skater on the team. He is capable of rushes from the back that are fast and dazzling. But, they just don't happen as often as you might like them to happen. He has played in nearly 600 games for the Dallas Stars and has played a ton of minutes. He can be trusted in his own end to usually make the proper decisions and to get the puck out of harm's way. He is tough and generally thought of as one of the core pieces of this group (thus the long term deal that has him under contract as long as anyone). At the end of the day, he is what he is. Solid, not flashy. Productive, not as productive as you might like. He has a fair deal which pays him as a #3 or #4 defensemen and he can do that. But, the idea that he would take another giant leap forward with his superior skating ability once he reached his late 20s hasn't fully taken shape. He is a nice piece to have and a member of your leadership group. If his puck skills could just improve a half-tick, perhaps his entire game could find the next level.

Sheldon Souray - 35 - Unrestricted Free Agent

Here is one of the questions the Stars must ask themselves immediately. And they likely already have their verdict. The question is, what does the blue-line look like if Souray doesn't return? Of course, to answer that properly, they must recognize that their are 3 kinds of nights with Souray at this age. Nights when he looks like a franchise defenseman and leads your team into battle. Nights when his feet look slow and father time has caught him. And, nights where he is missing due to nagging injuries. On those nights when he was right, he was clearly everything this squad has been seeking on the backend. But, how many nights were there? And how much do you pay for those, knowing that he is getting older and seeks multiple years in his next contract? Souray has an edge that can be priceless as both teams on the ice are aware of his mood and his ability to inflict punishment on anyone that comes toward the crease. The only question is whether his body can hold up for 2 or 3 more years. You would imagine there is a team that is willing to find out, but the Stars have given indications that they would happily pay more but only on a 1-year pact. But, if he is gone and they are not able to find a veteran replacement of equal or better ability, this could be a major blow to the group.

Mark Fistric - 25 - Restricted Free Agent

Fistric is a large man who can be an imposing figure on defense. So much so, that his solid checks now have him on NHL "watch lists" for big hits and shots that may border on being illegal. But, the bigger question as he now reaches a similar spot to where Niklas Grossman was last season, is whether he has a future with the organization. Grossman was much further ahead of Fistric in the pecking order where he had his spot every night and was a clear member of the top 4 when healthy. Fistric has had a hard time staying off the scratch list all season and seems to work his way into the doghouse at times. He will never be a threat with the puck, so then a defensive defenseman must always make sound decisions in coverage and not get caught up ice. His ice time has never been granted generously, and you have a suspicion that he has his list of doubters in the front office. Somewhere between 2008 and here, it seems the Stars have gone from believing he could be a core member of the Top 4 eventually, to now believing that he might always be a #6-#7 player on the edge of a roster. Personally, I always thought he deserved a better chance back there, but as time runs short on his restricted free agency window, it appears that he might ultimately experience that Grossman change of scenery that is sometimes good for a player.

Philip Larsen - 22 - Restricted Free Agent

One of the real success stories in the organization for 2011-12 must be the development of Larsen. It is very difficult to bring a player to the big leagues and yet make sure you are using him in spots where he can gain confidence and not asking him to do too much. A few days short of Thanksgiving, Larsen was called up, and aside from losing 3 weeks in recovery in January, Larsen was there each night showing he belonged. He demonstrated toughness at a very high level for a player with his skill set and showed the puck skills and Hockey IQ that were promised all along. The Stars made a point to generally use him only at equal strength, which is something that will no doubt change coming into this season. I think it is very easy to see his potential and given the lack of quality defensemen that have arrived in the last 4 years, Larsen puts a little spring in everyone's step about what year #2 in Dallas might offer. He sure looks like he could be a part of that young core if things continue to develop.

Adam Pardy - 28 - 1 year remaining on contract at $2m (UFA 2013)

A very curious piece of business completed by the Dallas Stars in the summer of 2011 was the 2-year, $4 million deal they gave to Adam Pardy. Even more curious, was the feeling from almost the end of training camp that they were wondering why they did that. At least, that is the indication to those on the outside that saw him play 36 largely anonymous games for the Stars. In fairness to Pardy, the erratic schedule he was on never allowed him to develop any sort of rhythm or continuity with any other defense partner or with the team in general. Every time he is playing, he is knocking off rust from not having played in 10 days, it seemed. But, in fairness to the Stars, we must assume he was not knocking socks off in practice and training camp to earn this role of what amounted to injury replacement defenseman, or the dreaded #7 guy on a 6-man depth chart. Surely, you can fill that spot at less than $2 per season, but the Stars must have thought last summer that they might have a real find if things worked out. He has more to his game than just defensive defenseman, as he actually can do a bit with the puck, but it doesn't really seem he is in the plans of the team enough to fully see that on a regular basis.

Brenden Dillon - 21 - 2 years remaining on entry level contract at $900k

Dillon is a sign of how your front office can really help itself in the NHL. Dillon, 15 months ago, was just a player that had not been picked in 2009 or 2010, and was looking for a job in professional hockey. So, he signed with the Stars and made some quick impressions in the AHL. Now, barely a year later, he is allegedly one of the most exciting pieces in the organization and poised to make the team in camp next season. He is a big, physical defenseman, but also has enough puck skills that the coveted, "big, 2-way defenseman" label is being attached to him. If he is a true late-bloomer that can step right in and add to a group that needs that skill set remains to be seen, but his debut in Game #82 for the Stars in April certainly did not slow down the hype train. If he is what he showed that night, there is no reason he cannot step right into the mix. And I imagine that has something to do with the way the Stars look at the Sheldon Souray decision. Would they rather have kids on the ice every night? Perhaps we will know soon enough.

Jordie Benn - 24 - Restricted Free Agent

The older brother of Jamie Benn is establishing himself to a point where we don't always have to introduce him as such. He is making his own name with his quality play in the AHL and is at an age where the Stars consider him a dependable call-up in a pinch. Whether he is more than that remains to be seen, but his flashes of offensive talent are impressive from a blue-liner. He is another story that will be hashed out in training camp, but Benn does seem to provide them with another quality option down the lineup should they want to go in that direction.

GOALTENDER

Kari Lehtonen - 28 - 1 year remaining on contract at $3.55m (UFA 2013)

Here is one of the more complex questions that the Stars must consider moving forward. Where are they with their goaltender in terms of locking him up for the long haul. He was grabbed at a bargain price for his 1st contract with the Stars, but that will expire by next season, and he would hit free agency at the right age to break the bank. What contract is he worthy of and what do the Stars want to pay are great questions. As for Kari the goalie, he has nights where he is flat-out elite. He has spent a lot of time bailing the Stars out of bad defensive situations with a composure level that is quite impressive. He makes great saves, controls his rebounds well, and with his large frame just shuts the door on a regular basis. Last season he provided some of the best goaltending this team has seen in a decade, but certainly did not save his best for last as the pressure of the playoff push looked to get in his kitchen a bit. But, any questions about his commitment level that were brought over from Atlanta have been put to bed a long time ago. He is a competitor and a very good goaltender. It wouldn't be shocking to hear that the Stars have extended his deal sometime this summer.

Richard Bachman - 24 - Restricted Free Agent

Bachman was not really on the radar for big league duty when the year began, but when Andrew Raycroft had major issues in the early months, the smallish goalie from Colorado College was given a great opportunity. And after he won his first 3 career starts - all on the road at LA Kings, NY Rangers, and NY Islanders - most observers had to do a double take. Bachman proved that he could handle the job by playing very well in spot starts all season long. Usually, he would get tough road dates, but pulled wins out of Chicago and Vancouver in February to really inspire a rare confidence in a young back-up. He really doesn't resemble the large Lehtonen in any way, accept for the composure and calm when chaos is breaking out all around them. He did have a slip or two late, including a forgettable outing in Winnipeg in March, but overall, he has more than earned the right to be the #2 going into next season and appears to have the quality to belong in the NHL. Very strong debut season for Bachman.

As you can see, there are plenty of things to sort through for this front office. The free agency class of 2013 is already on their mind, and aside from the Jamie Benn extension, they have all of these other pieces of business to deal with, too: Ribeiro, Morrow, Ryder, Lehtonen, Nystrom, and Pardy will all be UFAs in 1-season.

So, they need to have a strong draft, target and sign a major piece or 2 in free agency, consider trades, and talk extensions with the pieces they already have in place. All of this while properly projecting the kids coming up the pipeline from Austin.

The work for the front office never stops if they want to play hockey in May and June again soon.

Cowboys Mailbag - 6/2

To contact us Click HERE
OK, another Saturday morning is here, so let's knock out a weekend Cowboys mailbag! Generally, when I do this during this time of year, about 3 guys a week will ask why we are talking Cowboys now? Nothing is going on? How can you guys possibly talk Cowboys in May and June?

Here's how: We look at real issues and real items that are on our mind. Football is now 52 weeks a year, and with film study and new players to discuss, there is always time for Cowboys talk. So, if you have your favorite NFL team on your mind, let's go.

Here are some links to get you started:

The Fox Sports Southwest Bob Sturm Archive Page - This page will give you every thing I have written since the draft, including a profile on every player the Cowboys have added through the draft and plenty of other items, too. If you missed any, you can get up to speed right there.

The Full Bob Sturm Archive Page - This will get you all the way back to everything I have written since 2005 on the Cowboys and everything else. So, if you are like me, and you want to reference something we spent time on last November - In this case, a thorough breakdown of Rob Ryan's Fire Zone Blitzing - Then, these links will be useful to you.

Now, on to your emails:


I really enjoy your blog. It’s the best there is. Last year, when you were writing for the Dallas Morning News, you profiled the entire team. I found it particularly useful for more marginal players. This year, I’m wondering what your thoughts are about the trio of young receivers, Raymond Radway, Andre Holmes and Dwayne Harris, the Cowboys have on their roster. Radway seemed gifted in the pre-season (which happens from time to time with players who really lack the elite skills necessary for the real games). Any chance you could do a column on these players and other background players whom you see (or those you respect see) as having a chance to develop?

Thank you.

Regards,

J. David Green


Thanks, Mr. Green. I appreciate you bringing this up and I think for next week I will attempt to write a column about the "5 players on the roster that you might not know much about that you should get to know fast" or something like that. On that list for sure need to be the 2 developmental WRs, Radway and Holmes.

The Cowboys are thought to have the thinnest Wide Receiver corps in the division. In fact, yesterday on the air I was discussing the controversial idea that the Redskins may have the most receiver depth now from 1-4 or 1-5 in the Wide Receiver groups. Let's look at that now:

Cowboys: Bryant, Austin, Ogletree, Coale, Harris or Radway or Holmes
Eagles: DeSean Jackson, Jeremy Maclin, Riley Cooper, Jason Avant, Marvin McNutt
Giants: Hakeem Nicks, Victor Cruz, Rueben Randle, Ramses Barden, Jerrel Jernigan
Redskins: Pierre Garcon, Santana Moss, Josh Morgan, Leonard Hankerson, Anthony Armstrong

So, you can see, if you go 2 deep, you have to look at all 4 teams as quite reasonable. I think I would rater Nicks and Cruz above Bryant and Austin and Jackson and Maclin, personally, but all the teams are fortified there. Garcon and Moss may not have that top side game breaking, but Garcon is better than people think, and this myth that he is a Peyton Manning creation should be discussed against the reality that he had his best season of 70 catches and 947 yards last season as Manning watched from the sideline.

Now, factor in the 3rd receiver, and it would seem that much depends on the young development of Rueben Randle who might experience the biggest uptick in QB play possible in going from LSU to the NY Giants. Josh Morgan is an ideal 3rd WR in Washington after a bad 2011 in San Francisco. His 2010 had 700 yards and some pretty impressive catches. Jason Avant is a steady veteran who finds gaps in the secondary and Kevin Ogletree isn't scaring anyone.

But, when you go 4 deep, and the Redskins can run out the impressive Leonard Hankerson from Miami, that is where their depth of quality 1-4 might put them near the top of the division. I know that is all on paper, but the Redskins have done a very nice job of collecting weapons for Robert Griffin. RG3 has some places to go with the ball, it would appear.

But, however you measure things, 1-3 or 1-4 or 1-5, the depth of receiving corps at this point leave the Cowboys in last place in the division. Every team has a better option at #3 and #4 unless there is something cooking in the Cowboys camp that nobody else across the league is aware of.

Which brings us back to Radway and Holmes.

Raymond Radway is somewhat known for the way his 2011 camp went. He turned heads and appeared to have made the team as a McKinney kid who attended Abilene Christian. At 6'3, 195, he ran a 4.4 40 and can jump 38" so he has that athleticism that turned heads the moment he arrived. He was undrafted but jumped off the screen in some preseason games and looked poised to make the squad. But, with 3 seconds left in the final preseason game, he broke his leg badly in the end zone in Miami. 3 seconds separated him from making the roster by most accounts.

So, now he his healed and as fast as ever and ready to make an impression in camp again. So, we shall see.

Andre Holmes is from Chicago and attended Hillsdale College. There he had ridiculous numbers for a college receiver with over 100 catches and 1300 yards his senior season with 11 touchdowns. He is 6'5, 210 and that type of frame makes him a very attractive candidate for the position. He also has tremendous hands and is a very smart player. His dad played professional basketball overseas after a college career at DePaul. He was originally signed by the Vikings out of college, but did not make their roster through camp and the Cowboys grabbed him for the practice squad. He impressed the Cowboys so much through the season that they then moved him to the active roster in December to make sure no other teams tried to pluck him away off the practice squad.

Now, both of these players are undrafted free agents from the class of 2011. But, in both cases, the buzz about them both is such that we must take notice. The Cowboys, who are not above a judgement error, felt that Wide Receiver was not a desperate position on draft day because of these two. They think that one of them might be the answer to depth issues while everyone else in the football world is assuming Kevin Ogletree is that guy. I don't think the Cowboys have much hope for Ogletree at this point rather than as an insurance policy in case one of these guys or Danny Coale doesn't work out. I don't have much hope for Dwayne Harris, but perhaps he is the answer as the no-risk punt return guy. More on that, soon.

----

Should the Cowboys guards completely fail this year, ( to the point that it is very obvious they are not the answer) do the Cowboys have an escape plan? Are we going to be handcuffed to these 2 for years to come?

Stay hard,

P1 Jeff


Jeff, I think the Cowboys contracts that are in place for Nate Livings and Mac Bernadeau are such that if they do not work out they are easily disposed of after 2 seasons. Neither will be a millstone around the cap's neck. However, the very real issues of what are the plans this year to fix the interior issues on the offensive line which I think are substantial would still remain. There are others who we are thinking might be solutions, including Ronald Leary form Memphis and last year's 4th Round pick who has yet to be active on a Sunday, David Arkin, and Bill Nagy. They have numbers. But, like Wide Receiver, to the non Cowboys optimist, most NFL observers are sifting through the names as if it is the Indians roster at the start of the movie, Major League ("Who are these guys?").

They will have a chance to be pretty good if the Cowboys can get what they need from the group, but they are surely trying to do it without the major draft investment (David DeCastro) or major free agency investment (Carl Nicks) that many of us would have preferred. To suggest it is a area of importance in a division that requires your OL to handle the fronts in New York and Philadelphia is a tremendous understatement.

Time will tell, but we might be having these conversations about the wide receivers and offensive line next offseason, too.

Have a great weekend!

11 for '11: #3 - 3rd and 21 Sandlot Play

To contact us Click HERE
The Following is the 3rd in an 11-part weekly series throughout the summer that will focus on the eleven plays that shaped 2011 for the Dallas Cowboys. Every game, about 130 actual plays happen and over the course of a season that number can exceed 2,000. But, we have selected 11 and will pick one each week and break it down from standpoint of "X's and O's" and see what we can learn looking back. The plays are not ranked, simply presented as the season unfolded. We hope you enjoy.

As we look at the plays of the 2011 season that had the most impact, there are very few that come to mind that demonstrate the ability to defy the X's and O's like this particular play in Week 3 against the Washington Redskins.

To set up a few details, we must recall a couple things. First, the Cowboys have been dealing with all manor of injuries to their passing game. Miles Austin is not playing. Dez Bryant is attempting to return after missing the San Francisco game in Week 2. Laurent Robinson is making his Cowboys debut in this game after rushing to learn the playbook. And, maybe most importantly, Tony Romo is playing despite reports all week that it would be pretty difficult to play in this Monday Night game with his ribs and punctured lung preventing his ability to get comfortable. Reports all week about wearing special protection and sleeping in a chair at night were all over the news and therefore on the mind of all viewers.

Second, the game had been an absolute war. Both defenses were winning the battles most of the way. It was a very physical game, and from a Cowboys' perspective, a very frustrating one. The drives that were not sabotaged by poor execution by the offense was destroyed by a big night from a talented Redskins' defense. Laron Landry was destroying quite a few plays and the bookends of Brian Orakpo and Ryan Kerrigan were showing that they will be a force to be reckoned with for years to come.

Seldom do we have a game where there are 10 scores, and yet neither team breaks 20 points, but that happened in this divisional battle. The Cowboys surrendered the only touchdown of the game late in the 3rd Quarter as Tim Hightower caught a 1-yard Touchdown pass from Rex Grossman and the game went to the 4th Quarter with the visiting Redskins ahead, 16-12.

The 4th Quarter continued the theme of frustrating offense. The Cowboys could just not get into the end zone. And, despite kicking another field goal, would still trail 16-15 when they stopped the Redskins and forced a punt with under 4 minutes to play.

If Dallas was going to salvage this battle, they would have to generate points on this final drive from their own 14 yard line.

2 passes, 7 yards to Witten and 20 yards to Kevin Ogletree on a skinny post would get the ball to the 41 yard line.

On 1st Down from the 41, Jim Haslett and the Redskins are showing a Cover 0 blitz. This coverage simply means that they are bringing every available man. The Cowboys have 3 WR which are all locked in man coverage with their DB. Otherwise, all 8 Redskins defenders are lined up across the line and showing that they are all coming to get Romo. The only exception would be on the two players who are accounting for Felix Jones and Jason Witten. If they stay in to block, they are rushing. But, if Witten releases into a route, then the defender will go with. But, usually, when a team shows Cover 0, the QB then audibles to make sure his players stay home to pass protect in a situation like this.

We can only assume that Romo was attempting to change his play at the line to make that adjustment, but we will never know. Because as he is talking to Witten and his receivers, Phil Costa gets antsy and snaps the ball past Romo with his 3rd errant shotgun snap of the evening. Costa was having an awful night, which only added to the strife that existed in Cowboys' land after what appeared to be the premature release of veteran center, Andre Gurode only 2 weeks prior.

The ball fired past Romo and luckily, the ball bounced perfectly to Romo as Ryan Kerrigan is fighting to scoop the ball up as well. Felix Jones did a nice job of getting a shoulder into Kerrigan or surely the large linebacker was going to knock the ball free. The Cowboys lost 11 yards on the miscue, and Costa would get an earful from Romo, but they would retain possession.

2nd and 21. Again, the Redskins show Cover 0. Again, the Cowboys put on a slide protection and try to throw a quick slant to Robinson. Incomplete, but even if it was caught, it was only going for a yard or two. With 2 timeouts, it is possible that a punt and a stop could leave the Cowboys a desperation chance after a punt, but quite likely, the game would come down to the next play.

3rd and 21. The league conversion rate for 3rd and more than 10 yards is under 20%. The NFL average for 3rd and 20 is quite minute, and last year, the Cowboys were a very poor 3rd Down team in the 1st half of the season. Now, they faced a situation where they had to try to convert a 3rd and very long.

Let's consider the Redskins situation. They could assume that the Cowboys might consider this a 2 play situation to get 21 yards, but even so, if ever there was a spot where a very conservative approach on defense might be called for, it would seem this was it. The Cowboys passing attack had not shown - especially with the group of receivers they have available that they were potent. And we should all understand that Cover 0 blitzes have been phased out in the NFL more and more as the years have gone along because of the fact that they are too risky for defenses. Instead, the fire-zone blitzes are the new evolution, because those allow for chaos in pass protection, but still allow a 3-3 zone behind it. any blitz that allows a 6 man coverage is still tactically sound.

But, a cover 0 blitz? Sending 8 and the other 3 defenders are in man-to-man. Any bust in coverage is going to be a big play that will often end in a Touchdown. But, it worked on 1st and 2nd down. So maybe, Haslett thought his defense could do it one more time.

The Play: 3rd and 21 from Dallas 30 yard line - 2:20 left 4th Quarter - 12 Personnel (1RB, 2TE, 2WR)

The Cowboys bring on John Phillips for Robinson and Tashard Choice in for Felix Jones.

Picture #1 (Click on any picture to enlarge) shows that Romo sees the Redskins again in that same Cover 0 look. He has to believe that they are simply showing this look and will fall into something more conservative on 3rd and 21. The odds of a team blitzing out of Cover 0 3 times in a row with the game on the line just seems unlikely. Witten is in the slot left with Ogletree wide left. This is also the spot where he occupied on the Jesse Holley TD the week before.

#1


I encourage you to click on picture #2. It is clear that here, Ogletree is on a 10 yard sideline route and Witten is on his normal 10 yard hook. Both of these routes suggest that Cowboys are not going for 21 yards, they are running routes that can A) happen quick enough against Cover 0 blitzes and B) cut the mountain in half to set up a 4th and 10. Dez Bryant, as we saw in picture #1 is being played off by DeAngelo Hall. Hall is giving him space and the Cowboys have him set up for a quick pass from Romo (an obvious counter to a blitz) and there he will have a chance to get a chunk of yardage, especially if he can get Hall to miss on his tackle. Now, look at Romo. Romo is waving Bryant down the field with his left arm.

#2


In Picture #3, we see a few things that make this play amazing. First, Witten and Ogletree are eliminated from the play when Romo starts back-pedaling to his right. He knows that this play is now about one receiver and one chance. When he made this decision is open for debate, but at some juncture, Dez and Romo had the same idea. Go deep. The key for Dez is simple, give Romo the inside path. If Bryant can cross the face of Hall and have the entire open side of the field to work with, this play has a chance. Meanwhile, you can see London Fletcher free and within 5 yards of Romo. Tony now must let the ball go and give Dez a chance.

#3


And by picture #4, it is all over. Bryant had inside leverage and was able to keep Hall behind him and make the catch. Tack on a few more yards in the struggle and 15 more on a Hall face mask, and the Cowboys have not only converted a 3rd and 21, but also took the ball all the way to the Washington 25. It was an amazing 45 yard gain in all.

#4


Now, let's look from the End Zone. Picture #5 shows us that the Redskins lined up their Cover 0 blitz with a nice adjustment. Instead of having the two DBs as the most outside rushers, they have Orakpo (98) and Kerrigan (91) as the outsides. What this means is a difficult block for the RB if the Cowboys do what they will most certainly do, slide protection.

#5


Slide protection is how you try to block 8 players with only 7 blockers. It is trying to make a wall with your offensive line. In this case, they slide left. Which means, Free gets the flank with Orakpo. Then everyone takes the guy to his left. Of course, numbers-wise, this will not totally work out, so Phillips (lined up to Romo's right) will take the 7th man, OJ Atogwe (20) and Tashard Choice is going to try to get all the way across Romo and block the 8th man, Kerrigan (91). This, of course, is a mismatch.

#6


In Picture #7, you can see the man who comes free is Fletcher (59). This happens, because on the slide, Bill Nagy was trying to get Fletcher and Landry. This is why Romo starts backpedaling to his right, because he knows that math isn't going to hold up. Fletcher is running free and Romo is still backpedaling to buy Dez just a few more blinks of the eye to get inside leverage on Hall.

#7


Now, Romo is all the way back at his own 15, 15 full yards behind the line of scrimmage. Fletcher is closing in fast, so Romo is going to take a shot in the mouth if he doesn't release the ball now. But, since there is no safety in center field, Romo can simply lead Bryant and Hall can only hope the pass is off.

#8


Finally, the ball is now in the air. As you can see, DeAngelo Hall is well out of position here. And the 30 yard pass play on 3rd and 21 is about to be completed.

#9


It is only a play that works if the Redskins gamble on defense. The issue I would have with Haslett is that given his circumstances, his risk/reward meters seemed way out of balance. When expecting a long pass, you surely want to make sure you are minding center field. Otherwise, you are basing the entire game on the idea that you can get Romo with this blitz. And when you have the lead in the game, that is just not smart football.

Below, you can see the entire play off the TV copy and check it out for yourself. It was a great job by Romo again for figuring out a way to ignore the Xs and Os of the play call and figure it out as it is all happening. This is the upside of the gunslinger after we saw the downside with the Jets game. Also, a throw that is in open space to lead a receiver will come up again when Romo and Miles Austin could have clinched the Giants game in December - a play that will live in infamy.

Regardless, this was a very important play and one that shows that every once in a while, your opponent does you a favor. And their coaches make poor decisions, too.



11 for '11 series:

1. The Revis Interception
2. The Home Run to Holley

11 for '11: #4 - TD to Megatron

To contact us Click HERE
The Following is the 4th in an 11-part weekly series throughout the summer that will focus on the eleven plays that shaped 2011 for the Dallas Cowboys. Every game, about 130 actual plays happen and over the course of a season that number can exceed 2,000. But, we have selected 11 and will pick one each week and break it down from standpoint of "X's and O's" and see what we can learn looking back. The plays are not ranked, simply presented as the season unfolded. We hope you enjoy.

This week, in our 11 plays that shaped 2011 series, we need to visit about one of the plays of sheer, physical dominance that was performed at the expense of the Dallas Cowboys season. But, before we discuss Calvin Johnson turning a poor QB decision into a great play for his offense, we need to remember (painfully) how the Cowboys were put in this position in the first place.

This Week 4 game against Detroit helped determine the Cowboys early season mood. At one point, early in the 3rd Quarter, Tony Romo hit Jason Witten for a Touchdown pass that put the Cowboys comfortably ahead, 27-3. But, by the end of that same 3rd Quarter, one in which the Cowboys would run 25 plays and the Lions would run just 8, the margin had shrunk considerably, to 30-17.

And, the game turned - hard and unpredictably - on 3 1st Down passes. 2 from Romo and 1 from Stafford.

Before we spend time on today's feature play, let us spend a moment discussing the concept of QB decision making with regard to knowing which down it is. Downs, like strikes in baseball, are all equal in literal value. They are each a play. Strike one and strike three are both strikes. But, obviously, strike one is not a very big moment in an at-bat, whereas strike three has very sudden consequences.

The same is very true with downs for a QB and an offense. 1st Down and 3rd Down are each one play. But QBs are taught that good decisions on a play cannot be judged without knowing the down and distance. On 1st down, we need to be very conservative in our risk level. On 2nd down, we allow a bit more risk, but still err on the side of conservative decision making. On 3rd down, especially late in games, we may have to try to fit the ball into tighter spaces, but for the most part, we need to remember that a punt is almost always better than an interception. Only when you are down to your final bullet in a game do you allow the QB to simply throw caution to the wind and take a low-percentage chance.

And yet, here are two very good QBs, ignoring this discussion altogether. They don't ignore down relevance in their decision making very often. Matthew Stafford, who had a 41 TD/16 INT 2011, threw just 3 1st Down interceptions all season long versus 17 Touchdowns. That 113.5 QB Rating on 1st Downs demonstrates that he is a very intelligent QB who understands on 1st Down to only take what is presented by the defense. Only Aaron Rodgers and Matt Schaub had better 1st Down passer ratings than Stafford.

Romo, with 31 TDs and just 10 INTs overall in 2011, had great 1st Down results as well. He threw 13 TDs against just 4 INTs all season long. Trouble is, of his 4 1st Down interceptions, 3 were quite memorable. The INT to Revis in Week 1 and 2 giant 1st Down interceptions in the 2nd half of a Detroit game in which they had a 27-3 lead and let it all slip away with Romo's poor decisions that led to all sorts of developments (including a more conservative play-calling offense the next game in New England) as 2011 took shape.

Truth be told, we should likely assign one of those interceptions for the breakdown below. Instead, I selected the Lions 1st of 2 4th Quarter Touchdowns to Calvin Johnson for the duty. But, in terms of which plays turned an easy win into a frustrating loss, it was quite clearly a 1st Down interception that was returned for a Touchdown by former Cowboys' LB Bobby Carpenter when he dropped into his zone below a Dez Bryant route and had the ball thrown right to him.

The next possession, on 3rd down and 2, Romo trusted new weapon Laurent Robinson to cross the face of the cornerback Chris Houston on a slant route. This imperative move from the WR never happened, and Houston jumped the slant and returned another pick for a Touchdown, inexplicably closing a 27-3 lead to 27-17 without the Lions offense ever taking a snap.

Late in the game, with the Cowboys holding a 30-27 lead and having the ball with 4:22 to go, at their own 20 yard line, Romo committed maybe his worst pass of 2011. They were just a 4-minute drill from killing off this game despite all of the problems that led up to it, but on 1st Down, saw Jason Witten in a matchup with a linebacker that would be a converted route into a vertical past the safeties. If Romo delivers the ball, it might be an 80-yard Touchdown. Instead, the pocket is pushed back into Romo and he is forced to try to throw a deep pass while leaning on his back foot. He cannot get much on the throw and the ball flutters and falls into the hands of a waiting Lions' LB, Stephen Tollach. It is a perfect example of why coaches must still remind veteran QBs that there are times to try risky passes and times not to. Being ahead in the game and sitting on 1st Down is not one of them. Know the game situation or throw the game away.

Despite those very poor decisions from Romo that the national media would feast on for the remainder of the season, the most memorable play for me from this Week 4 battle was not those picks, nor was it the sack of Romo with 0:35 left in the game when rookie tackle Tyron Smith was tossed aside by Willie Young. That was the only time all year where Smith just looked physically dominated with a bull rush from another Lions' talent along their defensive front.

The play I will never forget - and I suspect the Cowboys defense would concur with this - was the play where Megatron made a very poor QB decision look like a brilliant one. Let's examine it.

THE PLAY: 13:47 left in 4th Quarter. Lions 1/10/Dallas 23 - (Shotgun) M.Stafford pass deep left to C.Johnson for 23 yards, TOUCHDOWN. Pass caught back of the end zone.

The Lions are in a very interesting 1st Down personnel package that is labeled "02 personnel". This is a 0RB 2TE 3WR package. Both tight ends are lined up off of right tackle and will both stay in for a maximum protection look. This is not typical of a 1st Down strategy, but perhaps that is why it works so well. They send Titus Young wide right, Nate Burleson wide left, and Megatron is in the slot to the left and is notated with the red circle in Picture #1. (CLICK ON ANY PICTURE TO ENLARGE)

#1


Picture #2 shows a blue circle around Cowboys MLB Sean Lee who is getting a deep drop in his zone, making us think that the Cowboys are in some sort of Tampa 2 with Lee turning his hips at the snap and heading into the deep middle. Alan Ball, the slot corner, is in the shallow zone with Johnson in the left slot. He does not go with the receiver at all, but rather gives him a near free release into the secondary.

#2


Alan Ball is in for Orlando Scandrick. Also, earlier in the game, the Cowboys lost Gerald Sensabaugh to injury and Barry Church has replaced him as the safety that is over to Johnson's side. The idea here with Lee and both safeties deep is to have a 5-3 zone and have 2-3 bodies around any deep threats. As Ball let's Johnson go, Church - in the white circle on Picture #3 - now takes over on Johnson who can either head to the corner or back to the post.

#3


What makes this play frustrating is that since the Cowboys are only rushing 3 against the Lions max protection, that means the Lions only have 3 receivers in routes against 8 Cowboys defenders in the secondary. The Cowboys have no coverage issues here at all, but conversely, Stafford has no pass rush at all with which to bother with. But, picture #4 shows us that Stafford has no business making this throw. We can certainly agree that Johnson can out-leap any player in the league and he is never truly "covered", but from the perspective of the Lions coaches - Jim Schwartz and offensive coordinator Scott Linehan - there is simply no way that they can look at this picture and say the risk is worth the reward on 1st Down. Take the underneath pass in the flat to Burleson and go to 2nd Down. Don't throw away a chance at points by tossing up a jump ball on 1st Down. It makes no sense.

#4


Stafford throws caution to the wind - perhaps because he plays with Johnson every day he knows that if he is going to roll the dice, this is the player to do it with against Barry Church - and lobs a pass up. In Picture #5, Johnson is in hand-to-hand combat with Church, with Mike Jenkins arriving to the outside and Sean Lee. Johnson is able to hold off Church with the arm fighting and time his leap wonderfully. By the end of the play, it looks like a man playing with his kids. It is about as physically dominating a moment as you will see in the NFL.

#5


Here is the play from the end zone camera, as the ball is arriving. Again, from the Detroit coaching staff's perspective, this throw is ill-advised. From the Cowboys coaching perspective, this is as covered as a player can get. Now, someone needs to simply knock the ball away. But, when you are facing a player with Johnson's height, strength, speed, and leaping ability, that is significantly easier-said-than-done.

#6


1st Down throws should always be high-percentage throws. Tossing the ball into triple coverage should be as crazy as the throws Romo made on 1st Down. But, Stafford had the wildcard of a receiver that makes all throws to him a high percentage decision. Would Sensabugh have done a better job than Church? I have no idea what he would have tried that wouldn't have either resulted in this same touchdown or a pass interference call. The officials will not call offensive pass interference unless there is a clear push, and on this play, it wasn't a clear push as much as two players fighting for space.

In breakdowns like this, you want to provide alternative ideas for defending that play. But, given the way the Lions defied all strategic decision making and just asked a player to make a play, you might just tip your cap. It was counterintuitive to smart football, but it certainly worked for them on this occasion.

The Lions scored here, Romo threw his 3rd pick on 1st Down with 4 minutes left, and then another TD to Johnson sealed the fate of the Cowboys. Their record fell to 2-2 and on their way to 8-8. Of all of the games they would want back that could have secured the NFC East title, this and the Arizona games would have to be those that really smart.



11 for '11 series:

1. The Revis Interception
2. The Home Run to Holley
3. 3rd And 21 to Dez

11 for '11 - DeMarco for 91 Yard TD

To contact us Click HERE
The Following is the 5th in an 11-part weekly series throughout the summer that will focus on the eleven plays that shaped 2011 for the Dallas Cowboys. Every game, about 130 actual plays happen and over the course of a season that number can exceed 2,000. But, we have selected 11 and will pick one each week and break it down from standpoint of "X's and O's" and see what we can learn looking back. The plays are not ranked, simply presented as the season unfolded. We hope you enjoy.

Today, we breakdown the success of the running game from Game #6 against St Louis and the rather unpredictable day they had that for a while - between the time that DeMarco Murray took over for an injured Felix Jones in New England until Murray himself was hurt in Week 14 against the Giants, proved the Cowboys had a very strong rushing attack. In fact, during that stretch of time (mid October until mid December), DeMarco Murray rushed for 824 yards which was the #1 total in the entire league. 2nd was Marshawn Lynch at 730, 3rd was Stephen Jackson at 675, 4th Arian Foster 654, and 5th Maurice Jones Drew at 650.

If Murray is what the Cowboys think he is - much of it expressed in this one run back in his 1st start - then you can understand why they are not entering this season stressing out about Felix Jones and his future. They think they may have found their man in the 3rd round of the 2011 draft out of Oklahoma. And if they are right, so many other pieces might fall into place.

As we pointed out at great length when this game was played, the Rams defense is lousy in stopping the run. In fact, in 2011, only Tampa Bay surrendered more big plays and more yardage than the Rams on the ground. They couldn't stop anyone, and finally, the low-on-confidence Cowboys OL found a side they could bully. This was much more fun than the week before in Foxboro against Vince Wilfork and company.

The play below was the single longest running play in the NFL in 2011. Flashes of Tony Dorsett from the Cowboys rookie and a play that was magical from an execution stand point. Let's take a look - CLICK ON ANY PICTURE TO ENLARGE:



The Situation: 1st Down and 19 to go; Dallas at their own 9 yard line. Dallas has "regular" or "21" personnel in the game. Murray, Fiammetta, Witten, Bryant, and Austin as the 5 skill players. Because of Witten, Bryant, and Austin, you can see the Rams have a 2 deep safety look, and the corners up on the wide-outs. Dez, in particular is being pressed.



Witten is flexed right - away from the Right tackle - where the Rams must consider him a very likely primary read in the event that this is a passing play. The Cowboys love to put their opponents in this pickle, although they prefer it be on 1st and 10 rather than 1st and 19. On 1st and 19, your safeties will often be deep and happy to concede a 5-yard run and assume a offensive play-caller is going to be itchy to get all of those yards back quickly.

This inside zone run/pass option has been seen a thousand times if you follow the Cowboys. The quick read touchdown in Houston from 2010 is an example of the exact same concept where Tony Romo sees the pass on the outside and opts to throw the ball. I recommend you follow the link to that play for last season and experience the play from the pass option standpoint to really get an appreciation for the complexities of 1 play and why training camp is so important to a team to be able to explore the countless options on 1 single play.

On the run/pass option draw, the blockers are 100% committed to the run option. They cannot concern themselves with whatever Romo decides to do. Their job is to sell that they are pass protecting to their opponents so that their opponent will fall into the trap of edge rushing upfield. This is what the offense wants from the Defensive Ends. Allow them to take the edge and to take themselves out of possible rushing lanes. This is done by having each tackle simply turn their body towards the near sidelines and the defensive ends will generally do the rest. On this particular play, 3 of the 4 Rams DL fall for the bait. The LDE, RDE (James Hall), and RDT (Fred Robbins) require almost no blocking whatsoever - simply for 68-Free, 77-Smith, and 63-Kosier to step aside.

Then, after the trap is set, with those 3 DL cleared out, it becomes quite easy to double team with 67-Costa and 64-Holland on DT Gary Gibson. Murray is following his FB Tony Fiammetta into the right "A" gap (the gap between the center and guard). This has to happen quickly because once the defenders who rushed up field see they have been fooled, there is really no protection for the RB to keep from being caught from behind. The play's timing is key.



In the picture above, you see the 3 red arrows, denoting how the 3 Rams' LBs are going to get blocked. Holland is going to get his double team on Gibson and then slide to the Will LB. Witten is going to cut off the Sam. And Fiammetta is going to go get the Mic (Laurinaitis).

And now, the success of the play - or why this play can either go for 3 yards or 91 yards falls to 4 players besides DeMarco Murray. 82-Jason Witten, 24-Tony Fiammetta, and two Rams' safeties, 27-Quintin Mikell (deep left from Murray's view), and 20-Darian Stewart (deep right). Fiammetta's lead block on 55-James Laurinaitis is very impressive and demonstrates his strength and mobility. But, what I am drawn to more and more was the job that Witten does on a far more difficult block. Blocking is all about leverage and position. If I want to rebound a basketball, I need inside position and to keep my defender from getting inside me to the rim. In football, the rim is always moving, because the ball carrier is what I am trying to protect from my defender. Much more difficult, and the officials are making sure I don't hold.



Above, you can see the alley for Murray. Inside the blocks from Kosier and Fiammetta. Then, read Witten to see if this should go to the middle or bounce to the outside.

So, for Witten to seal the inside position on 57-Chris Chamberlain, when Chamberlain already has leverage on Witten shows us two things. 1 - that Chamberlain is far more concerned about Witten in a pass route. Until the very end, he appears to be squared up to counter whatever pass route Witten is about to run. He saw the offensive line in a posture to pass protect and quickly deduced that this is a pass play. By the time he figures out that Witten is not running a route, but attempting to seal him off from Murray, it is too late. Chamberlain has fallen into the trap. 2 - Witten is an excellent blocker and understands to use his threat as a receiver to his advantage. It is very subtle, but when you watch the end zone camera, it shows that he is still pretty solid at blocking. And that is why people consider him the best "all-around" tight end of this decade. Others can catch the ball and challenge downfield more, but he does it all.



Meanwhile, here is another lesson in Running Backs versus Safeties in the open field. As a defense, you hope that this doesn't happen very often, because the safety is at a distinct disadvantage to start the play 10-15 yards deep and to have to make a 1-on-1 tackle in the open field. But, wow, Stewart is just a blur as he takes a poor angle and isn't even close on his attack. Mikell is at least in the picture, but Murray's cutback makes Mikell look like a garden gnome.



You have to really appreciate Murray's decisive cutbacks. He plants his foot and goes. There is no question once he gets an idea of where he is going next. We saw this all day on Sunday. And Quintin Mikell, a player I thought would help the safety position in Dallas this summer, is proving that against the run, he is not very skilled. There were several other plays on Sunday where he took poor angles and missed tackles. And when a safety misses a tackle, there is usually nobody behind him to clean up his mess.



91 yards where 11 players are working in concert very well. Even Dez Bryant helps with a convoy to the endzone and we get to see Murray and Bryant sprinting next to each-other. This is the type of play that makes the film room happy. Murray did receive much of the credit, but there are plenty of good grades to go around here. Textbook stuff.

Here is the video of the entire play - (Courtesy, Fox Sports)



Of all of the plays from this series, this one is the best to sink hopes for 2012 into. Not that 91 yards can happen, but the idea that this might be a legitimate full-time, multi-purpose back to compliment the offense. Julius Jones showed similar flashes in 2004, but the Cowboys obviously hope that there is some more long-term stability with Murray. More importantly, this is the rare explosive running play that can really change a game and put the Cowboys opponents on watch.

11 for '11 series Previous Plays :

1. The Revis Interception
2. The Home Run to Holley
3. 3rd And 21 to Dez
4. Megatron's Dominating TD

18 Haziran 2012 Pazartesi

How the Offense All Fits Together

To contact us Click HERE
Today is one of those blogs where many who have played football for any length of time might not learn anything they haven't heard in high school or college from their coaches in the film room. But, for those of us who have little or no actual playing experience, it is a topic worth discussing during the offseason to try and explain why coaching and play-calling is a very delicate dance that must be performed with circumstances each Sunday.

Since 2008, on my personal blog, I have been logging every play-call, down and distance, and personnel grouping from every snap of every game. During this time, with well over 4,500 play calls, we have a really interesting profile of how Jason Garrett runs his offense. There have been many variations and personnel situations that have caused him to morph his philosophy as the offensive coordinator and then the head coach, but it is all sitting there in the data base and logged for analyzation.

We have the data available to see what the Cowboys are good at offensively, bad at offensively, and a third category that is inconsistent enough to say that we just don't know what the performance is going to be sometimes.

But, what is interesting to me is that when you examine this data, or even just as you keep up with our weekly "Decoding Garrett" studies that are linked here if you are so inclined to kill off the rest of your day, we come up with many reasons why the offense is not as good as the other heavyweights in the NFL. Personnel-wise, when you stack up the Cowboys offensive skill position personnel with those teams that win Super Bowls or consistently play deep into January (Saints, Patriots, Packers, Giants, Colts), you feel pretty good, usually.

So, why, then, do the results suggest that the Cowboys are not a team that fits into January very often?

And the answer to that is different, depending on who you ask. I consume a lot of NFL programming on television and on the radio. I would be more than happy if the NFL was to the USA as soccer is to Europe. What that means is if the season went from August to May and there were really no other major sports, I would be fine with that. I love the NFL that much.

But, I don't love how the NFL is critically covered. I think we "dumb down" the conversations and simplify all issues to the most ridiculous standards. And therefore, nationally especially, when the conversation comes up about why the Cowboys don't win more in the post-season, invariably, the answer from people who either don't study the team or don't know how to study the team always arrives at 2 places: Tony Romo (The QB) and Jason Garrett (The Coach).

It would be one thing if it was just callers who would ignore data and 900 snaps to focus on 5-10 snaps that were poor, but it is not. It is a wide array of media and many on the set of NFL Network or ESPN which can certainly cause your average fan to take notice. Wow, if Jamie Dukes thinks this, and if he played in the league as long as he did, surely he is right. Meanwhile, when talking about him and his golf and his wife and baby, we must also roll highlights behind him of the Revis interception, the Bobby Carpenter interception, and the missed FG hold in Seattle in 2006

Because clearly, if you have a QB who throws 31 TDs and 10 Interceptions, has a QB Rating of 102.5, and has his best season of his career by almost all individual metrics - including the 2007 season when his team was 13-3 - we should all look at the QB as the reason the season went bad. Why? Because! It is easy and simple! Blame the most famous football player on the team who plays the position that we can all see easily. Never-mind the other positions. They are just there to keep him company. The defense? That doesn't matter either if you listen to the radio or watch the television. It is Romo. The Cowboys are never going to win with Romo. This is a critical year for Romo. Romo...Romo...Romo...Romo.

It is enough to make you try to avoid the noise. If they are not going to explain why the Cowboys function as they do without digging deeper than the very top, most simple layer, then why even bother? Nobody is saying that Tony Romo is perfect, or even elite all of the time, but to suggest that QB is holding this franchise back over the last 7 seasons is insane on almost every level. But, it is way easier to answer shortly and confidently that Romo is the problem. To explain a more complex disfunction in the organization is boring and laborious.

So, now, I am sure you are asking: "So, if it isn't what they say it is, what is the problem?" And if you read my works on a regular basis, this is going to be repetitive. But, here is the really abbreviated version.

The line of scrimmage on both sides of the ball have not been a strength of the team since the dynasty days of the 1990s. This decay during the Romo era has led to issues in the running game, pass protection, and play-calling. Our data seems to suggest that in 2011, just like 2008-2010, the Cowboys would enter games with a game-plan not to attack and to win, but to protect their under-manned offensive line - which is most certainly not a recipe for dominance.

Here is part of our study after the debacle in Arizona in early December:

the differences between the home and road game plans are so drastic and frankly, predictable, that one certainly has room to wonder if the Cowboys attempt to call two different game plans.

At home, they are aggressive and determined. Run and pass splits are nearly identical. They often make their opponents choose their poison and then serve it up on a platter. It may not always work, but they are adventurous and creative in the way they go about their business. They will try even trick plays, they will pass when you think run, they will pound the ball until you can stop it, and they have a swagger.

On the road, they are timid. They are easily chased off their objectives. They abandon the run early and often. They put everything on their QB and his ability to make lemonade out of lemons. They seem to call plays in an effort to prevent disasters rather than to attack. They send a message to the troops that they are not sure if they can score points, so they often don't.

And this pattern has been in place for quite a while. Nobody is saying they never bring their home personality on the road, because they do. And sometimes, their road personality shows up in Arlington, too. But, if you look at the large sample under the play-calling of Jason Garrett, it is clear that there is a split in objectives and intentions between home games and road games.

Let's look at some evidence.

The best way a play caller can send a message to his opponent is by calling plays on 1st Down. It establishes the tone and attitude of the offense and declares to the opponent what is planned for the day.

But, when the Cowboys have been at home this season, on 1st and 10, the Cowboys have run 177 plays. The splits for those 177 snaps to start a play sequence has been 98 runs and 79 passes. The 55%/45% split demonstrates proper balance for a balanced offense. On 1st Down, you run the ball more because on 3rd Down, you almost never run. But as a whole, 55% runs on 1st Down will mean that your overall balance will be intact.

Conversely, when the Cowboys have played their 6 games on the road, they have had 172 1st and 10 situations. The splits on 1st Down when they have been on the road has seen just 68 runs and 104 passes. This 39%/61% split on 1st and 10 sets the Cowboys up for days where they never get anything done on the ground and become a 1-dimensional team. We have even heard explanations about the opponent putting an eighth man in the box to encourage the Cowboys to start slinging the ball around the yard.


Those last several paragraphs are why people like me constantly beg Jerry Jones to properly address his offensive and defensive lines. Once you can protect and fortify your pass protection and run game, then you can actually get back to the objectives of football. To grind out a win by forcing your will on your opponent, rather than trying to keep Vince Wilfork or Jason Pierre Paul from injuring your QB. And, what would be so bad about having a few players on defense that put the fear of Randy White in the minds of your opponents?

Football is a game that is won up front. And it always has been. Despite the evolutions in the game, it still comes back to the line of scrimmage. Which is why I will always argue for David DeCastro or Fletcher Cox on draft day and I will always cringe when some talking head brings up the idea that Tony Romo is on the hot seat after putting up a 31/10 season.

Which brings us to a piece of video from the current series on the NFL Network, Top 100. It profiles and ranks players from 100 to 1, and gives us 10 hours of football content during the heart of the offseason. During Jason Witten's profile, he had a brief reference to this point that validates the issues in the New England game from last October:



Witten is talking to the receivers at the 2:45 mark of that video in Foxboro on the bench: "Listen, here's the game. Stops, seam stops, drags. That's what we have to do. If we can't hold up the protection, we have to get the ball out and do something with it."

What he was talking about were the extremely short routes that are a counter to your offensive line falling apart (again). They were reduced to 3 and 5 step drops in this game and many others because the line was getting destroyed. And when you don't have protection, you can't hold the ball (or run the ball). So you have to throw quick routes into tight confines (because the defense knows you can't protect and they are jumping the short routes, too).

So, we can talk Dez or DeMarco or Romo all we want. It is fun to do and they are important pieces. But, you can see, that the game plan is different when the Cowboys know they are outclassed at the line of scrimmage. We don't see the "Jason Garrett Offense". Instead, we see "the offense that they think they can run without getting Romo killed" offense. If you can't block Vince Wilfork and friends - or the Giants in New York or the Eagles in Philadelphia - then you cannot get your run game going. You also seldom can throw the ball deep. And on and on it goes.

Before long, you are getting mad at Romo and Garrett for play calling and not putting points on the board. And in both cases, they are partly to blame. But, the real blame goes to the fact that even when everyone is healthy, in 2011, the offensive line was nowhere near the level of a contender. Nowhere near, in fact. And you cannot look at sacks allowed to validate this fact. Because, the Cowboys were avoiding sacks by not calling plays where there was any chance of sacks. But, that was limiting their offense in these key "showdown" games to 20% of their playbook. Vanilla, quick hitting passes and shotgun draws. It is easy to defend and difficult to put points on the board. And we really shouldn't blame the players on that offensive line, but rather the architects of the roster who put them in that position that they were not ready for. The decision makers who shape the roster are the ultimate stop for the credit or blame of any franchise.

We hope that in 2012, the problems have been fixed, but we will definitely have to see that interior hold up against live action before we are willing to go out on that limb.

But, until that time, we will continue to hear people tell us that Romo is just not a great leader and needs to be more clutch from those that shape opinions.

Or, we can watch baseball.